Exploitation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 149.9.0.57 (Talk); changed back to last version by Bearster) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster | Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster | ||
In common parlance, "exploitation" is an emotionally-charged term used to describe the employer-employee relationship. It is an intellectually dishonest attempt to portray something as bad or immoral without bothering to make a rational argument to show that it is so. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 25 April 2007
This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms.
Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster
In common parlance, "exploitation" is an emotionally-charged term used to describe the employer-employee relationship. It is an intellectually dishonest attempt to portray something as bad or immoral without bothering to make a rational argument to show that it is so.