Exploitation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms. | This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms. | ||
Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." | Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster | ||
In common parlance, "exploitation" is an emotionally-charged term used to describe the employer-employee relationship. It is an intellectually dishonest attempt to portray something as bad or immoral without bothering to make a rational argument to show that it is so. | |||
Latest revision as of 15:57, 25 April 2007
This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms.
Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster
In common parlance, "exploitation" is an emotionally-charged term used to describe the employer-employee relationship. It is an intellectually dishonest attempt to portray something as bad or immoral without bothering to make a rational argument to show that it is so.