<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AEpistemology</id>
	<title>Talk:Epistemology - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AEpistemology"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Talk:Epistemology&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-02T01:27:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Talk:Epistemology&amp;diff=7985&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bold Standard at 22:30, 16 June 2006</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Talk:Epistemology&amp;diff=7985&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-06-16T22:30:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The William James reference in the &amp;quot;Problem of Universals&amp;quot; section is absolutely unfounded.  James was a pragmatist, which means he was a subjectivist.  For him, a concept is valid if, and only if, it serves a practical purpose, and that purpose &amp;#039;&amp;#039;makes it valid&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-- whether it &amp;quot;corresponds to reality&amp;quot; is, for James, irrelevent.  That &amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039; reality, in his view.  In what way this anticipates the Objectivist theory of concepts, is beyond me.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bold Standard</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>