Exploitation - Revision history

74.70.62.96 at 15:57, 25 April 2007

2007-04-25T15:57:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 25 April 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster		Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster

			In common parlance, "exploitation" is an emotionally-charged term used to describe the employer-employee relationship. It is an intellectually dishonest attempt to portray something as bad or immoral without bothering to make a rational argument to show that it is so.

GreedyCapitalist: Reverted edits by 149.9.0.57 (Talk); changed back to last version by Bearster

2007-01-15T08:52:17Z

Reverted edits by 149.9.0.57 (Talk); changed back to last version by Bearster

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 15 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Exploitation~~, the noble, Objectivist concept of work. If you're~~ not ~~paid enough to live on, get another job, if there's no better job, go die in the woods, someone else needs your job~~.		This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms.

			Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster

149.9.0.57 at 02:19, 15 January 2007

2007-01-15T02:19:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:19, 15 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~This tongue-~~in~~-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms.~~		Exploitation, the noble, Objectivist concept of work. If you're not paid enough to live on, get another job, if there's no better job, go die in the woods, someone else needs your job.

	~~Exploitation: "when~~ someone ~~works for terms that I would not accept~~.~~" -- Bearster~~

Bearster at 04:35, 28 June 2004

2004-06-28T04:35:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 28 June 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms.		This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms.

	Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept."		Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept." -- Bearster

	-- Bearster

Bearster at 04:35, 28 June 2004

2004-06-28T04:35:11Z

New page

This tongue-in-cheek definition is offered because it illustrated why non-objective notions like "exploitation" are rationally unusable terms.

Exploitation: "when someone works for terms that I would not accept."

-- Bearster