<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Acapier</id>
	<title>Objectivism Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Acapier"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/Special:Contributions/Acapier"/>
	<updated>2026-07-02T01:24:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Emotions&amp;diff=4913</id>
		<title>Emotions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Emotions&amp;diff=4913"/>
		<updated>2005-06-03T23:56:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Acapier: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Emotions happen as a response to your value-judgements of a particular object, person, event, etc.; and in order for man to have a legitimate value-judgement of something he must first &#039;&#039;know&#039;&#039; something about it.  Reason gives him knowledge, and his value-judgements, based on that knowledge, give him emotions.  Thus, man cannot have emotions without first possessing knowledge; in addition, the extent of his knowledge of something will determine his emotional involvement in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example:  A man sitting in a room is being witnessed by three other men, each with their own knowledge of him.  The first witness knows the man as his brother, and feels ashamed; the second witness does not know the man at all, and therefore feels nothing for him, good or bad; the third witness knows this man as his wife&#039;s murderer, and feels rage against him.  They all three have different feelings (based on their individual value-judgements), yet they are judging the same man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every emotion has a cause, and it is the responsibility of the rational mind to explore any emotion that is unaccounted for, and check its validity against the facts of reality.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Acapier</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Emotions&amp;diff=4745</id>
		<title>Emotions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Emotions&amp;diff=4745"/>
		<updated>2005-06-02T01:57:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Acapier: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Emotions happen as a response to your value-judgements of a particular object, person, event, etc.; and in order for man to have a legitimate value-judgement of something he must first &#039;&#039;know&#039;&#039; something about it.  Reason gives him knowledge, and his value-judgements, based on that knowledge, give him emotions.  Thus, man cannot have emotions without first possessing knowledge; in addition, the extent of his knowledge of something will determine his emotional involvement in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example:  A man sitting in a room is being witnessed by three other men, each with their own knowledge of him.  The first witness knows the man as his brother, and feels ashamed; the second witness does not know the man at all, and therefore feels nothing for him, good or bad; the third witness knows this man as his wife&#039;s murderer, and feels rage against him.  They all three have different feelings (based on their individual value-judgements), yet they are judging the same man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intuition (the &#039;&#039;feeling&#039;&#039; that something is or could be) is often mistaken as a path to knowledge.  It is not, as reason is man&#039;s only way to gain such things.  The confusion may lie in the misunderstanding of intuition&#039;s role in the process.  It can very well be a &#039;&#039;motivator&#039;&#039; for one to begin the search for knowledge of a particular thing, but it cannot be the &#039;&#039;means&#039;&#039;.  One may feel that unicorns are real, but until s/he has proof of such it is not knowledge; s/he cannot say, &amp;quot;I know that unicorns are real because I feel that it is so.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every emotion has a cause, and it is the responsibility of the rational mind to explore any emotion that is unaccounted for, and check its validity against the facts of reality.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Acapier</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Emotions&amp;diff=4744</id>
		<title>Emotions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.objectivismonline.com/index.php?title=Emotions&amp;diff=4744"/>
		<updated>2005-06-01T21:58:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Acapier: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Emotions happen as a response to your value-judgements of a particular object, person, event, etc.; and in order for man to have a legitimate value-judgement of something he must first &#039;&#039;know&#039;&#039; something about it.  Reason gives him knowledge, and his value-judgements, based on that knowledge, give him emotions.  Thus, man cannot have emotions without first possessing knowledge; in addition, the extent of his knowledge of something will determine his emotional involvement in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example:  A man sitting in a room, by himself, is being witnessed by three other men, each with their own knowledge of this man.  The first witness knows the man as his brother, and feels ashamed; the second witness does not know the man at all, and therefore feels nothing for him; the third witness knows this man as his wife&#039;s murderer, and feels rage against him.  They all three have different feelings (based on their individual value-judgements), yet they are judging the same man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intuition (the &#039;&#039;feeling&#039;&#039; that something is or could be) is often mistaken as a path to knowledge.  It is not, as reason is man&#039;s only way to gain such things.  The confusion may lie in the misunderstanding of intuition&#039;s role in the process.  It can very well be a motivator for one to begin the search for knowledge of a particular thing, but it cannot be the means.  One may feel that unicorns are real, but until s/he has proof of such it is not knowledge; s/he cannot say, &amp;quot;I know that unicorns are real because I feel that it is so.&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Acapier</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>